The Relationship between Religiosity and Subjective Well-Being in Takmir Who Works as a Fisherman
-
Muhammad Khuzullifsar(1*)
Universitas Nusa Cendana
-
M. K. P. Abdi Keraf(2)
-
Dian Lestari Anakaka(3)
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
This study aims to determine the relationship between religiosity and subjective well-being in Takmir mosque who works as a fisherman. The number of samples in this study was 40 fishermen in Kupang City who were Muslim. The data collection method was carried out using a questionnaire divided into three scales, namely the religiosity scale adapted from Satriani, (2011), and the two subjective well-being scales of the PANAS (Positive Affect and Negative Affect Scale) expressed by Watson, Clark, and Tellegen (1988) and SWLS (Satisfaction with Life Scale) based on the theory stated by Diener (1999). The results showed a significant relationship between religiosity and subjective well-being at the mosque takmir who works as fishermen where the Pearson Correlation value = 0.610 with a significance value of 0,000 (ƿ<0.05). This study aims to provide a new understanding of increasing welfare by increasing the religiosity value of the individual.
Downloads
References
Agustina, F & Utami, M. 2016. Religiusitas dan Kesejahteraan Subjektif pada Pasien Jantung Korone. Gadjah Mada Journal Of Psychology. Vol. 2, No. 3, 162-171.
Ancok, D & Suroso, F.A. (2005). Psikologi Islami: Solusi Islam atas Problem Problem Psikologi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Argyle, M. (2000). Psychology and religion. New York: Routledge.
Ariati, J. (2010). Subjective Well-Being (Kesejahteraan Subjektif) Dan Kepuasan Kerja Pada Staf Pengajar (Dosen) Di Lingkungan Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Diponegoro. Jurnal Psikologi UNDIP. Vol 2, No 8.
Aziz Muslim, Manajemen Pengelolaan Masjid, Jurnal Aplikasi Ilmu-Ilmu Agama, Vol. V, No. 2, Desember 2004, hal. 107.
Azwar, S. (2010). Sikap manusia teori dan pengukurannya. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar.
Azwar. 2012. Reliabilitas dan Validitas. Edisi 4. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Chang, W. C. (2009). Religious attendance and subjective well-being in an eastern-culture country:. Marburg Journal of Religion, 4(1).
Compton, W. C. (2005). An Introduction to Positive Psychology. Belmont: Thomson Wadsworth.
Damon, W., Menon, J., & Bronk K.C. (2003). The development of purpose during adolescence. Applied Developmental Science. Vol.7 No.3,119-128
Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction with Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71-75.
Diener E, Scollon CN, Oishi S, Dzokoto V, and Suh, M. (1997). Recent Findings On Subjective Well-Being. Indian Journal of Clinical Psychology, Vol. 1., p:159–76.
Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Lucas, R. E. (2003). Personality, culture, andsubjective well-being: Emotional and cognitive evaluation of life. Annual Reviews Psychology. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145056.
Dimitra, S. & N. Yuliastuti. 2012. Potensi Kampung Nelayan Sebagai Modal Permukiman Berkelanjutan di Tambak Lorok, Kelurahan TanjungMas. Semarang, Jurnal Perencanaan. Vol 1 No. 1.
Gonner, C., Cahyat, A., Haug, M., dan Limberg, G. (2007). Menuju Kesejahteraan: Pemantauan Kemiskinan di Kutai Barat, Indonesia. Bogor: CIFOR.
http://simas.kemenag.go.id/index.php/profil/masjid/page/40/?kabupaten_id=307
Hafizah Sarah & Mawarpury Marty. 2019. Kesejahteraan Subjektif pada Pemulung: Tinjauan Sosiodemografi. Gadjah Mada Journal Of Psychology, Vol 5, NO. 2, 2019: 139-150
Headey, B. & Wooden, M. (2004). The Effects of Wealth and Income on Subjective WellBeing and III-Being. Economic Record, 80,1,24-33.
Himam, D. D. (2015). Subjective Well Being Pada Hakim Yang Bertugas. Gadjah Mada Journal Of Psychology, Volume 1, No. 3,192 – 203.
Huppert, F. A. (2009). Psychological well-being: Evidence regarding its causes andconsequences. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-0854.2009.01008.x
Khalek, A. M. (2010). Quality of life, subjective well-being, and religiosity in muslim college students. Qual Life Res .
Krause, N. (2003). Religious Meaning and Subjective Well-Being in Late Life.Journal of Gerontology, Vol. 58B: S160-S170.
Moh. E. Ayub dkk, Manajemen Masjid…, hal. 42-44.
Muzakkiyah Nurul & Suharnan. 2016. Religiusitas, Penyesuaian Diri dan Subjektive WellBeing. Jurnal Psikologi Indonesia. 5(1): 28-38.
Notoatmodjo. 2012. Metodologi Penelitian Kesehatan. Rineka Cipta. Jakarta
Papalia, D.E. , Olds, S.W. & Feldman, R.D. (2009). Human development (9th Ed.). NewDelhi: Tata McGraw- Hill.
Periantalo, J. 2015. Penelitian Kuantitatif untuk Psikologi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
Satriani. 2011. Hubungan Tingkat Religiusitas Dengan Kecemasan Moral Mahasiswa Ushuluddin Uin Suska Riau. Skripsi. Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau.
Seftiani A. Nur & Herlena Benny. 2018. Kecerdasan Spiritual sebagai Prediktor Kesejahteraan Subjektif pada Mahasiswa. Jurnal Psikologi Integratif. 6(1), 101-115
Setiawan Aris & Pratitis Niken. 2015. Religiusitas, Dukungan Sosial dan Resiliensi Korban Lumpur Lapindo Sidoarjo. Jurnal Pskologi Indonesia. 4(22): 137-144
Sugiyono. 2013. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Alfabeta. Bandung.
Sugiyono. 2014. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, kualitatif dan kombinasi (mixed methods). Bandung: Alfabeta.
Svensson, J. (2015). Religious education and teaching young people about humanity :Suggesting a new role for RE and for the academic study of religions in Sweden, 51(2), 177–200.
Utami Sofiati Muhana. 2012. Religiusitas, Koping Religius, dan Kesejahteraan Subjektif.Jurnal Psikologi. 39(1): 46-66.
Wahyudin, Y. (2015). Sistem sosial ekonomi dan budaya masyarakat pesisir. Bogor Agricultural University. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.1.2522.6965.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. Journal of personality and social psychology, 54(6), 1063.
Yani, A, Panduan Memakmurkan Masjid, (Jakarta: Dea Press, 1999), hal.35
Copyright (c) 2021 Muhammad Khuzullifsar, M. K. P. Abdi Keraf, Dian Lestari Anakaka
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Journal of Health and Behavioral Science (JHBS) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. You are free to copy, transform, or redistribute articles for any lawful purpose in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and JHBS, link to the license, indicate if changes were made, and redistribute any derivative work under the same license. Copyright on articles is held by the authors. By submitting to JHBS, authors grant any third party the right to use their article to the extent provided by the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
