PERBANDINGAN PARAMETER FISIOLOGI ANTARA AYAM HUTAN HIJAU (Gallus varius) DAN AYAM KAMPUNG (Gallus gallus domesticus) ASAL PULAU ALOR
-
Alva Chrisjel Tabelak(1*)
Universitas Nusa Cendana, Fakultas Kedokteran dan Kedokteran Hewan
-
Heny Nitbani(2)
Departemen Anatomi, Fisologi, Farmakologi, dan Biokimia, Fakultas Kedokteran dan Kedokteran Hewan, Universitas Nusa Cendana
-
Tri Utami(3)
Departemen Klinik, Reproduksi, Patologi dan Nutrisi, Fakultas Kedokteran dan Kedokteran Hewan, Universitas Nusa Cendana.
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Physiological parameters are one of the indicators to determine the
condition of the body and its organ systems, indicating whether they are healthy
or experiencing physiological abnormalities and disorders. Examples of
physiological parameters include heart rate, respiratory rate, and body
temperature. Birds are considered healthy if all organ systems in their bodies are
functioning properly, according to the reference data based on physiological
parameters. The green junglefowl and native chickens from Alor island are two
types of birds that have different habitats and behaviors. This study examines the
physiological parameters of these two animals, with the end result being
physiological data and statistical comparisons. This physiological data serves as
an assesment and knowledge of the condition of green junglefowl and native
chickens. Three green junglefowl and three native chickens from Alor island were
used in this study. The research was conducted for three consecutive days with
measurements taken at 07.00, 12.00 and 18.00. The results showed that the
average heart rate, respiratory rate, and body temperature of green junglefowl
were higher than those of native chickens. The comparison of research data was
analyzed using independent T-test and Mann-Whitney test. The data analysis
results showed that there were significant differenses in the data between green
junglefowl and native chickens
Downloads
References
Riyanti, R. 2021. “Effect of Sex Differences on
Breath Frequency, Heart Rate, Shank
Temperature, and Rectal Temperature of KUB
Chicken”. Jurnal Riset Dan Inovasi Peternakan.
Shank Temperature. Vol. 5 No. 2. pp. 2598–
3067
Hapsari, N.I, Santosa, E.P, Riyanti. 2016
“The Difference of Conventional Brooding and
Thermos System to Physiology Responses of
Broiler”. Jurnal Ilmiah Peternakan Terpadu
Vol. 4 No. 3. pp. 237-243
Jumaryoto, Budiyanto, A., and
Indarjulianto, S. 2020. “The Heart and
Respiration Rate on Postpartum Ongole
Crossbreed Cattle after Infusion Povidone
Iodine 1%”. Jurnal Sains Veteriner, Vol. 38 No.
3. pp. 252-259.
Nawaz, A.H., Amoah, K., Leng, Q.Y.,
Zheng, J.H., Zhang, W.L., Zhang, L. 2021.
“Poultry Response to Heat Stress: Its
Physiological, Metabolic, and Genetic
Implications on Meat Production and Quality
Including Strategies to Improve Broiler
Production in a Warming World”. Frontiers in
veterinary science.
Wuryanto, I.P.R., Darmoatmodjo, L.M.Y.D.,
Dartosukarno, S., Arifin, M. and Purnomoadi,
A. 2010. Frekuensi napas, pulsus, dan gerak
rumen serta suhu tubuh pada kambing
peranakan ettawa selama 3 bulan pertama
kehidupan pasca lahir. Semarang.
Yunike, T., Suharyati, S. and Khaira N.
2011. Respon Fisiologis Ayam Jantan Tipe
Medium Di Kandang Panggung Dengan
Kepadatan Berbeda, Bandar Lampung.
Sundari, R.D., Erwantob , Santosa, E.S.
2015. “Physiological Responses of The Rooster
Medium Type Which Were Given Rations in
Different Levels of Crude Fiber”. Jurnal Ilmiah
Peternakan Terpadu Vol. 3 No. 2. pp. 78-8h
Tamzil, M., H. 2014. “Stres Panas pada
Unggas: Metabolisme, Akibat dan Upaya
Penanggulangannya”. WARTAZOA. Vol. 24
No.2. pp. 57-66
Copyright (c) 2025 Alva Chrisjel Tabelak, Heny Nitbani, Tri Utami
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Visit Our G Scholar Profile
