The Relationship of The College Admissions Selection System With The Grade Point Average of Graduates of The Bachelor of Medicine
Abstract
Background: The Grade Point Average (GPA) is an essential factor in medical
education, since it is used to evaluate the quality of graduates, with a correlation
between a higher GPA and higher-quality doctors. College admission selection
system, which is aimed at identifying prospective students who are most likely to
succeed in completing education at Faculty of Medicine and has Predictive
Validity for undergraduate GPA, is one of factors that can influence GPA.
Objective: Knowing the connection between college admissions selection system
and grade point average for medical graduates.
Methods: This research is an analytic observational study using a Cross
Sectional design conducting to utilize a questionnaire on medical graduates for
2020 and 2021 periods. Total Sampling was utilized with a total sample size of
125 people (57 medical graduates for 2020 period and 68 medical graduates for
2021 period) who matched the research criteria. The research was evaluated
univariately and bivariately using Somers'd correlation and One Way ANOVA
tests, respectively.
Result: The bivariate analysis for medical graduates for 2020 period produced a
p value = 0.349. For medical graduates, a value p = 0.001 and r = 0.280 were
obtained for 2021 period. The value of p = 0.010 was achieved in the One Way
ANOVA test.
Conclusion: For 2020 period, there is no relationship to college admission
selection system and GPA of medical graduates. However, for 2021 period, there
is a significant relationship between college admission selection system and GPA
of medical graduates, and relationship is included in a weakly positive
correlation. In addition, the average GPA of medical graduates varies according
on college admission selection system. Graduates who enter tertiary institutions
by SNMPTN route have the highest average GPA, followed by those who enter
through SBMPTN and SMMU.
Keywords: College Admissions Selection System, GPA, Medical Graduate
Graduates
Downloads
References
2. Catur MMSP, Rahmatika A, Oktaria D. Faktor-Faktor yang Memengaruhi Prestasi Akademik pada Mahasiswa Kedokteran Prelinik. J Ilm Mhs Kedokt Indones. 2018;6(2):109–17.
3. Pramana SW, , CH Nawangsih P, , Tri Nur K. Hubungan Antara Indeks Prestasi Kumulatif dengan Nilai UKDI Pada Program Pendidikan Dokter : Studi Kasus Fk Undip. 2011;
4. Presiden Republik Indonesia. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2013 Tentang Pendidikan Kedokteran. 2013.
5. Suswati I, Rahayu R. Validitas Prediktif Hasil Belajar Mahasiswa Kedokteran dengan Uji Kompetensi Mahasiswa Program Profesi Dokter. Saintika Med. 2019;15(1):1.
6. Nurhadi A, Salmah S, dkk. The Relationships of Students Admission Process and Academic Achievement. Indones J Med Educ. 2020;9(1):1.
7. Stegers-Jager KM, Themmen APN, Cohen-Schotanus J, Steyerberg EW. Predicting performance: Relative importance of students’ background and past performance. Med Educ. 2015;49(9):933–45.
8. Li J, Thompson R, Shulruf B. Struggling with strugglers: Using data from selection tools for early identification of medical students at risk of failure. BMC Med Educ. 2019;19(1):1–6.
9. Mustika S S, Inayati I, Ikhlas I, Ap F, Muslish M, Kedokteran DP, et al. Predictive Validity Ujian Saringan Masuk Fakultas Kedokteran terhadap Indeks Prestasi Kumulatif ( IPK ) Tahap Sarjana. JK Unila. 2016;1(2):313–8.
10. Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Nusa Cendana. Buku Panduan Akademik Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Cendana 2020/2021. 2020.
11. Salsabila NS, Wahyudi K, Pratiwi YS, Ariyanto EF, Achadiyani A. The Relationship Between Types of Admission Selection and Academic Achievement in the First-Year Students During the Transition To Distance Learning Due To Covid-19 Pandemic. Indones J Med Educ. 2022;11(1):64.
12. Octavira T, Prabandari YS, Kristina TN. Tes Seleksi Mahasiswa Baru Sebagai Prediktor Terhadap Prestasi Akademik. Tunas Med. 2016;3(1).
13. Indonesia. Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 6 Tahun 2020 Tentang Penerimaan Mahasiswa Baru Program Sarjana Pada Perguruan Tinggi Negeri. 2020.
14. Universitas Nusa Cendana. SMMU2022 [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2022 Jan 7]. Available from: https://smmu.undana.ac.id/
15. Biggs J, Kember D, Leung DYP. The Revised Two Factor Study Process Questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F. Br J Educ Psychol. 2001;71:133–49.
16. Triabdi J, Diana Alexandra F, Jelita H. Hubungan Seleksi Jalur Masuk Penerimaan Mahasiswa Baru dengan Indeks Prestasi Kumulatif (IPK) pada Mahasiswa Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Palangka Raya. Kedokt Univ Palangka Raya. 2021;9(2):1372–7.
17. Ashaeryanto A, Kristina TN, Hadianto T. The Relationships of the Types of Entry Selection of Students with Their Learning Motivation, Learning Strategies, and Learning Achievement. Indones J Med Educ. 2017;6(1):1.
18. Kedang EFS, Nurina RL, Manafe DT, Glazebrook A. Analisis Faktor Resiko yang Mempengaruhi Kejadian Depresi pada Mahasiswa Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Nusa Cendana. Cendana Med J. 2020;1(April):87–95.
19. Pangestu C MMS, Rahmatika A, Oktaria D. Faktor-Faktor yang Memengaruhi Prestasi Akademik pada Mahasiswa Kedokteran Tahap Preklinik. Jimki. 2018;6(2):109–16.
20. Putri K, Malik R. Hubungan Peran Orang Tua dengan Motivasi Berprestasi Mahasiswa Angkatan 2016 Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Tarumanagara. Tarumanagara Med J. 2020;3(1):127–32.
21. Suhaimi A binti. Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Kualitas Pembelajaran terhadap Nilai Indeks Prestasi Kumulatif (IPK) Mahasiswa Angkatan 2014-2016 Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Hasanuddin Tahun 2017. Vol. 93. UNIVERSITAS HASANUDDIN; 2017.
22. Indriyani R. Pengaruh Asal Sekolah dan Tempat Tinggal terhadap Prestasi Belajar Mahasiswa. Wiraraja Med J Kesehat. 2014;4(1):34–9.
23. Baptista Y. Hubungan Self Directed Learning Readiness dengan Prestasi Belajar Mahasiswa Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Nusa Cendana. Vol. 3. Universitas Nusa Cendana; 2020.
24. Ngara CARD. Hubungan Depresi dengan Indeks Prestasi Akademik(IPK) pada Mahasiswa Program Studi Arsitektur. Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Nusa Cendana; 2021.
25. Alkautsar MR, Susilawati, Azhar MB. Hubungan Akreditasi Sekolah , Asal Sekolah , Jalur Penerimaan Mahasiswa dan Tempat Tinggal dengan Indeks Prestasi Kumulatif Mahasiswa. Biomed J Indones. 2018;4(3):140–8.
26. Cahyani DA, Pramono A. Hubungan Pendekatan Belajar dan Hasil Tes Masuk (Admission Test) dengan Performa Akademik Mahasiswa Kedokteran. Bio Komplementer Med. 2019;6(3):1–8.
27. Oktaria D, Lisiswanti R. Hubungan antara Jalur Seleksi dengan Hasil Uji Kompetensi Mahasiswa Program Profesi Dokter. JK Unila. 2018;2(2):136–41.
28. Utomo B, Roostantia R, Safitri I. Analisis Faktor yang Berpengaruh terhadap Tingkat Kelulusan UKDI Dokter Baru Lulusan Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Airlangga. Pendidik Kedokt Indones. 2014;3(1):18.
29. Rahmat I. Perbedaan Rerata Indeks Pretasi Kumulatif Berdasarkan Jalur Masuk pada Mahasiswa Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Andalas. Universitas Andalas; 2019.
Copyright (c) 2023 Cendana Medical Journal (CMJ)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.