Analisis Kesalahan Menyelesaikan Soal Matematika dalam Materi Matriks pada Siswa Kelas XI MIIA MAN 1 Flores Timur
-
Asmiyati Dua Sabon(1*)
Universitas Nusa Cendana
-
Siprianus Suban Garak(2)
Universitas Nusa Cendana
-
Aleksius Madu(3)
Universitas Nusa Cendana
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
This study aims to describe students’ errors in solving mathematics problems on matrix topics in class XI MIIA at MAN 1 Flores Timur. This research employed a qualitative approach with a descriptive research design. Data were collected through tests and interviews, involving 9 students categorized into three ability levels: high, medium, and low. The research instrument consisted of the researcher as the main instrument, supported by mathematics ability tests, matrix tests, and interview guidelines. Data analysis was conducted through the analysis of students’ written work and interview results, while data validity was ensured using the technique of triangulation. The findings indicate that high-ability students (T1, T2, and T3) tend to make errors in process skills and in writing final answers. Medium-ability students (D1, D2, and D3) make errors in understanding the problem, process skills, and writing final answers. Meanwhile, low-ability students (R1, R2, and R3) exhibit more complex errors, including difficulties in understanding the problem, process skills, and writing final answers. These findings suggest that process skill errors are the most dominant type of error across all levels of student ability
Downloads
References
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education (Sixth). Routledge.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (Third). SAGE Publications, Inc.
Fanggi, I. S., Samo, D. D., & Udil, P. A. (2023). Analisis Miskonsepsi Siswa Kelas IX SMP Negeri 1 Rote Barat Daya Pada Materi Eksponen Ditinjau Dari Tingkat Kemampuan Siswa Dan Alternatif Solusi Dengan Konflik Kognitif. Haumeni Journal of Education, 3(2), 73–82.
Hermanto, B. D., & Susilawati. (2023). Analisis kesulitan belajar siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal matriks. Al-Bahjah Journal of Mathematics Education, 1(1), 22–32.
Kristianto, E., Mardiyana, & Saputro, D. R. S. (2019). Analysis of Students’ Error in Proving Convergent Sequence using Newman Error Analysis Procedure. IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series, 1180, 012001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1180/1/012001
Lestari, R. S., Purnami, A. S., & Arigiyati, T. A. (2021). Hubungan antara Motivasi Kemandirian Belajar dan Persepsi Siswa terhadap Matematika dengan Prestasi Belajar Siswa SMK. UNION: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 9(1), 91–100. https://doi.org/10.30738/union.v9i1.7965
Lyany, E. G., Dominikus, W. S., & Udil, P. A. (2023). Pembelajaran Matematika Realistik Berbasis Etnomatematika Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas VII SMPK Sta. Theresia Lamahora. Jurnal Magister Pendidikan Matematika (JUMADIKA), 5(2), 67–76. https://doi.org/10.30598/jumadikavol5iss2year2023page67-76
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An expanded sourcebook. SAGE Publications Inc.
NCTM. (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. NCTM.
Noutsara, S., Neunjhem, T., & Chemrutsame, W. (2021). Mistakes in Mathematics Problems Solving Based on Newman’s Error Analysis on Set Materials. Journal La Edusci, 02(01), 20–27. https://doi.org/10.37899/journallaedusci.v2i1.367
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Results (Volume I): What Students Know and Can Do. PISA, OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en
OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 Results (Volume I). PISA, OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en
Sari, D. P., Syafi, M., & Nurwiatin, N. (2020). Analisis Kesulitan Siswa dalam Penyelesaian Soal Matematika pada Materi Matriks. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan STKIP Kusuma Negara II, 388–396.
Silva, A. D. C. E., Garak, S. S., & Udil, P. A. (2023). Analisis hasil belajar materi perbandingan berdasarkan ranah kognitif revisi taksonomi bloom. Fraktal: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 4(1), 37–49.
Son, A. L., Darhim, & Fatimah, S. (2019). An analysis to student error of algebraic problem solving based on polya and newman theory. IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series, 1315, 012069. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1315/1/012069
Udil, P. A., & Amsikan, O. N. (2020). Analisis Miskonsepsi Siswa Kelas VIII SMPN Loro Tuan Pada Materi Pola Bilangan Dengan Certanty of Response Index (CRI). Asimtot: Jurnal Kependidikan Matematika, 2(2), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.30822/asimtot.v2i2.770
Udil, P. A., Jupri, A., Nurlaelah, E., & Mone, S. T. (2024). Mathematical Literacy of Grade 8 Junior High School Students on Algebra Material. Asimtot : Jurnal Kependidikan Matematika, 6(1), 13–21.
Udil, P. A., Kusmayadi, T. A., & Riyadi. (2017). Profile of mathematics anxiety of 7th graders. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1868. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4995144
Udil, P. A., Senia, M. E., & Lasam, Y. (2021). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa Sd Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita Operasi Hitung Bilangan Cacah Berdasarkan Prosedur Newman. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika (Jupitek), 4(1), 36–46. https://doi.org/10.30598/jupitekvol4iss1pp36-46
Copyright (c) 2026 FRAKTAL: JURNAL MATEMATIKA DAN PENDIDIKAN MATEMATIKA
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
- Hak publikasi atas semua materi naskah jurnal yang diterbitkan/dipublikasikan dalam situs E-Journal Fraktal ini dipegang oleh dewan redaksi dengan sepengetahuan penulis (hak moral tetap milik penulis naskah).
- Ketentuan legal formal untuk akses artikel digital jurnal elektronik ini tunduk pada ketentuan lisensi Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA), yang berarti Jurnal Fraktal berhak menyimpan, mengalih media/format-kan, mengelola dalam bentuk pangkalan data (database), merawat, dan mempublikasikan artikel tanpa meminta izin dari Penulis selama tetap mencantumkan nama Penulis sebagai pemilik Hak Cipta.
- Naskah yang diterbitkan/dipublikasikan secara cetak dan elektronik bersifat open access untuk tujuan pendidikan, penelitian, dan perpustakaan. Selain tujuan tersebut, dewan redaksi tidak bertanggung jawab atas pelanggaran terhadap hukum hak cipta.
