TAMPILAN PERTUMBUHAN F1 UMUR DELAPAN MINGGU HASIL PERSILANGAN AYAM BETINA SABU DENGAN BEBERAPA STRAIN AYAM JANTAN (F1 growth display eight weeks of age the result of crossing Sabu female chickens with several strains of roosters)
-
Herowati Titi Pangestuti(1*)
Peternakan Undana
-
Herayanti P. Nastiti(2)
Universitas Nusa Cendana
-
Clerens W. Naetasi(3)
Universitas Nusa Cendana
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Enhancing the productivities of domestic Sabu Island chickens can be achieved through the strategic cross-breeding of distinct chicken types. The fulfillment of local poultry demand can be augmented by implementing crosses between indigenous Sabu and Kate chickens and conventional laying hens, thereby promoting an increase in body weight gain. The primary objective of the research was to ascertain the growth performance of chickens subsequent to the crossbreeding of various lines of male and female chickens indigenous to Sabu Island. The research method used a Completely Randomized Design with three treatments (P1 = native male Sabu × native female Sabu, P2 = male Kate × female native Sabu, P3 = laying male × female native Sabu) and four replications. The material used was forty-eight chicks from crosses, each of which produced sixteen chicks. The parameters measured were feed consumption, body weight gain, and feed conversion for 8 weeks. The results of the research, Sabu, Kate, and Layer chickens showed feed consumption of 508.60 ± 87.81 gr/head/week, 372.38 ± 25.86 gr/head/week, and 1020.20 ± 53.78 gr /head/week; body weight gain 158.17 ± 36.47 gr/head/week, 115.53 ± 6.78 gr/head/week, and 272.57 ± 36.81 gr/head/week; ration conversion 3.32 ± 0.83, 3.22 ± 0.19, and 3.22 ± 36.81,. 3.77 +/- 0.30 The results of analysis of variance showed that the effect of treatment on ration consumption and body weight gain was very significant (P<0.01), but not significant on ration conversion (P>0.05). The conclusion drawn is that the growth performance of chickens exhibited an improvement through crossbreeding among various lines of male chickens and indigenous Sabu female chickens. This enhancement was particularly notable in terms of feed consumption and weight gain, as observed within the parameters of treatment P3.
Downloads
References
Aryanti F, Aji MB, Budiono N. 2013. Pengaruh Pemberian Air Gula Merah terhadap Performans Ayam Kampung Pedaging. Influence of Palm Sugar Water in the Native Chicken Performance. Jurnal Sain Veteriner, 31(2013).
Fahrudin A. 2017. Konsumsi ransum, pertambahan bobot badan dan konversi ransum ayam lokal di Jimmy’s Farm Cipanas Kabupaten Cianjur. Students E-Journal, 6(1).
Fathullah F, Iriyanti N, Sulistiyawan IH. 2013. Penggunaan pakan fungsional dalam ransum terhadap bobot lemak abdomen dan kadar kolesterol daging ayam broiler. JIP, 1(1), 119–128.
Gaspersz V. 1995. Teknik analisis dalam penelitian percobaan. Tarsito. Bandung, 718.
Hyun Y, Ellis M, Riskowski G, Johnson R W. 1998. Growth performance of pigs subjected to multiple concurrent environmental stressors. Journal of Animal Science, 76(3), 721–727.
Jatmiko J, Nur H. 2016. Pengaruh penggantian sebagian ransum komersial dengan dedak padi terhadap performa ayam kampung. Jurnal Peternakan Nusantara, 2(1), 27–34.
Lokapirnasari WP, Soewarno YD. 2011. Potensi Crude Spirulina Terhadap Protein Effisiensi Rasio pada Ayam Petelur Potency of Crude Spirulina on Protein Efficiency Ratio in Laying Hen. Jurnal Ilmiah Kedokteran Hewan Vol, 2(1), 5–8.
Mookiah S, Sieo CC, Ramasamy K, Abdullah N, Ho YW. 2014. Effects of dietary prebiotics, probiotic and synbiotics on performance, caecal bacterial populations and caecal fermentation concentrations of broiler chickens. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 94(2), 341–348.
Muharlien M, Achmanu A, Kurniawan A. 2010. Efek lama waktu pembatasan pemberian pakan terhadap performans ayam pedaging finisher. Ternak Tropika Journal of Tropical Animal Production, 11(2), 88–94.
Pamungkas RS, Ismoyo I, Santosa SA. 2013. Kajian bobot tetas, bobot badan umur 4 dan 8 minggu serta korelasinya pada berbagai itik lokal (Anas plathyrynchos) dan itik Manila (Cairina moscata) jantan. Jurnal Ilmiah Peternakan, 1(2), 488–500.
Sinaga, S. 2009. Nutrisi dan Ransum Babi. Penerbit: Kanisius. Yogyakarta.
Subekti K, Arlina F. 2011. Karakteristik genetik eksternal ayam kampung di kecamatan sungai pagu kabupaten solok selatan. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu-Ilmu Peternakan, 14(2), 74–86.
Sumanto EJ, Iskandar S, Wibowo B, Santoso R, Rusmana N. 1990. Pengaruh perbaikan tatalaksana terhadap penampilan usaha ternak ayam buras di Desa Pangradin: Suatu analisa ekonomi. I1mu Dan Peternakan, 4, 322–328.
Wahju J. 2004. Ilmu Nutrisi Unggas. Edisi ke-4. Universitas Gadjah Mada Press, Yogyakarta.
Wijayanti RP, Busono W, Indrati R. 2011. Pengaruh suhu kandang yang berbeda terhadap performans ayam pedaging periode starter. Fakultas Peternakan. Universitas Brawijaya. Malang.
Wiranata GA, Dewi G, Indrawati RR. 2013. Pengaruh energi metabolis dan protein ransum terhadap persentase karkas dan organ dalam ayam kampung (Gallus domesticus) betina umur 30 minggu. Peternakan Tropika, 1(2), 87–100.
Yamin M. 2002. Pengaruh Tingkat Protein Pakan terhadap Konsumsi, Pertambahan Bobot Badan dan IOFC Ayam Buras Umur 0-8 Minggu. Jurnal Agroland, 9(3), 229–235.
Zainal H, Sartika T, Zainuddin D, Komarudin. 2012. Persilangan pada ayam lokal (kub, sentul, gaok) untuk meningkatkan produksi daging unggas nasional. Workshop Nasional Unggas Lokal, 102–108.
Copyright (c) 2023 JURNAL NUKLEUS PETERNAKAN
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
.jpg)
