Forgiveness in Enright’s Theory: A Study of College Students with a History of Non-Suicidal Self-Injury
Abstract
Introduction Forgiveness is an important psychological process that supports emotional recovery among individuals with a history of Non-Suicidal Self-Injury (NSSI).
Aim This study aimed to explore the self-forgiveness process based on Enright’s Process Model of Forgiveness among female university students in Kupang City with NSSI experiences. A qualitative descriptive approach was employed involving five female university students. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and analyzed using thematic analysis.
Result The findings showed that participants experienced four phases of forgiveness: Uncovering, characterized by guilt, shame, and self-blame; Decision, marked by the commitment to forgive themselves; Work, involving self-compassion, acceptance, and social support; Deepening, reflected in emotional relief, self-acceptance, and personal growth.
Conclusion Participants progressed through these phases at different paces depending on their personal experiences and social support. The findings suggest that self-forgiveness is a gradual process that promotes emotional healing and psychological growth among female students with NSSI histories.
Downloads
References
Byrne, D. (2021). A worked example of Braun and Clarke's approach to reflexive thematic analysis. Quality & Quantity, 56(3), 1391–1412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01182-y
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Enright, R. D. (2001). Forgiveness is a choice: A step-by-step process for resolving anger and restoring hope. American Psychological Association.
Enright, R. D., & Fitzgibbons, R. P. (2015). Forgiveness therapy: An empirical guide for resolving anger and restoring hope (2nd ed.). American Psychological Association.
Hasking, P., Boyes, M., Finlay-Jones, A., McEvoy, P. M., & Rees, C. S. (2020). Common pathways to nonsuicidal self-injury and suicide ideation: The roles of rumination and self-compassion. Journal of Affective Disorders, 276, 809–815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.07.056
Kim, H. S., Sherman, D. K., & Taylor, S. E. (2008). Culture and social support. American Psychologist, 63(6), 518–526. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.63.6.518
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224–253. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224
Neff, K. D. (2023). Self-compassion: The proven power of being kind to yourself (Updated ed.). William Morrow.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, Article 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860
Saldaña, J. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Tong, A., Sainsbury, P., & Craig, J. (2007). Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 19(6), 349–357. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042
Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Westview Press.
Victor, S. E., & Klonsky, E. D. (2019). Daily emotion in non-suicidal self-injury. Clinical Psychological Science, 7(4), 701–714. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702619827018
Wenzel, M., Woodyatt, L., Okimoto, T. G., & Worthington, E. L., Jr. (2021). Dynamics of moral repair: Forgiveness, self-forgiveness, and the restoration of value consensus as interdependent processes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 47(4), 607–626. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167220937550
Copyright (c) 2026 Hauri Uljanati Sole, Mernon Yerlinda Carlista Mage, Diana Aipipidely, M. K. P. Abdi Keraf

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Journal of Health and Behavioral Science (JHBS) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. You are free to copy, transform, or redistribute articles for any lawful purpose in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and JHBS, link to the license, indicate if changes were made, and redistribute any derivative work under the same license. Copyright on articles is held by the authors. By submitting to JHBS, authors grant any third party the right to use their article to the extent provided by the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Hauri Uljanati Sole(1*)





