IMPLEMENTATION OF THE AGRICULTURAL INDEPENDENCE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR INMATES AT THE CLASS IIA CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION IN KEDIRI
Abstract
This study examines the implementation of the agricultural independence development program at the Class IIA Kediri Correctional Institution. The program has not been implemented optimally because there is no specific agricultural development framework within the institution, and only a small number of inmates participate despite the availability of relatively large agricultural land. The purpose of this study is to analyze how the agricultural development program is implemented, identify the obstacles faced, and evaluate its contribution to social reintegration and food security. The research uses a descriptive qualitative approach, with data collected through observation, interviews, and document analysis conducted at the Assimilation and Education Facility (SAE). The findings show that the program is carried out through a practical “learning by doing” approach, where inmates are directly involved in agricultural activities. This program provides benefits by equipping inmates with basic agricultural skills and contributing to the availability of food supplies for the correctional institution. However, its implementation still faces several challenges, including limited budget allocation, low inmate participation, lack of staff expertise in agriculture, and weather conditions that affect agricultural productivity. Although the program contributes to social reintegration and supports food security, its impact remains limited due to the small scale of implementation. Therefore, improvements are needed through increased inmate participation, better staff training, and the development of strategies that can adapt to climate conditions. The proposed “OPTIMIS” program offers a solution by strengthening collaboration with the Agriculture Department and universities, providing more structured training, and offering incentives such as certificates for participating inmates, so that the program can have a broader impact on social reintegration and institutional food security.
Keywords: Program Implementation; Food Security; Kediri Class IIA Prison; Self Reliance Development; Agriculture; Social Reintegration
Downloads
References
Antara Metropolitan. (2012). Pangan Rakyat Soal Hidup atau Mati (petikan Pidato Bung Karno tahun 1952). Antara.
https://megapolitan.antaranews.com/berita/1425/pangan-rakyat-soal-hidup-atau-mati-petikan-pidato-bung-karno-tahun-1952
BPS. (2023). Jumlah Penduduk Pertengahan Tahun (Ribu Jiwa), 2021-2023. Badan Pusat Statisika Indonesia. https://www.bps.go.id/indicator/12/1975/1/jumlah-penduduk-pertengahan-tahun.html
Brenner, C. A. (2022). Self-regulated learning, self-determination theory and teacher candidates’ development of competency-based teaching practices. Smart Learning Environments, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-021-00184-5
Creswell, J. W. (2018). Mixed Methods Procedures. In Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches.
Darwis, A. M. F. (2020). Penerapan Konsep Community Based Correction Dalam Program Pembinaan Di Lembaga Pemasyarakatan. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Sosial, 6(1), 01. https://doi.org/10.23887/jiis.v6i1.24081
Fiantika, F. R., Wasli, M., Jumiyati, S., & Honesti, L. (2022). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif (Nomor April).
Hartati, S., Yahya, M. R., & Sutrisno, S. (2024). Implementasi Program Ketahanan Pangan Dalam Bidang Pertanian Di Desa Mayang Sari. Jdp (Jurnal Dinamika Pemerintahan), 7(1), 107–119. https://doi.org/10.36341/jdp.v7i1.4193
Herliansyah, D. P. (2020). Pelaksanaan Program Pembinaan Kemandirian Melalui Kegiatan Kewirausahaan Bagi Narapidana Di Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Kelas IIA Mataram. JPEK (Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi dan Kewirausahaan), 4(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.29408/jpek.v4i1.1977
Isl Aldiena, Q., Supianto, & Yuli Winiari, W. (2022). Dampak Kelebihan Kapasitas Terhadap Pemenuhan Hak-Hak. Welfare State, 1(April), 81–106.
Jatnika, D. C., Mulyana, N., & Raharjo, S. T. (2015). Residivis Anak Sebagai Akibat Dari Rendahnya Kesiapan Anak Didik Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Dalam Menghadapi Proses Integrasi Ke Dalam Masyarakat. Share : Social Work Journal, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.24198/share.v5i1.13086
Melati, D. P. (2018). Hal Yang Melemahkan, Menakutkan, Atau Hal Yang Dimaksudkan Untuk Menakuti Musuh Dalam Melakukan Penyerangan, Mampu Atau Dimaksudkan Untuk Menaku-Nakuti. Viva Themis, 1(1), 55–60.
Novitasari, Y., & Wibowo, P. (2021). Pembinaan Kemandirian Dalam Membangun Kepercayaan Diri Narapidana Di Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Widya Yuridika, 4(2), 485–494. https://doi.org/10.31328/wy.v4i2.2411
Palit, D. D., Tulusan, F. M. G., & Palar, N. (2022). Implementasi Program Bantuan Dana dan Sembako bagi Masyarakat Terdampak Covid-19 di Desa Kaasar Kecamatan Kauditan. JAP, VIII(113), 12–20.
Ramadhan, A. G., Ginting, M. L. B., & Octenta, C. (2021). Efektivitas Program Pembinaan Kemandirian pada Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Berbasis Industri. Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum, 15(2), 181. https://doi.org/10.30641/kebijakan.2021.v15.181-198
Sembiring, T. B., Irmawati, Sabir, M., & Tjahyadi, I. (2024). Buku Ajar Metdologi Penelitian (Teori dan Praktik).
Sjahrir, Korten, D. C., & Abadi, A. S. (1988). Pembangunan Berdimensi Kerakyatan. Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
Surya, R. A., & Rahmat, D. (2024). Penerapan Teknologi Pertanian Sebagai Upaya Pemberdayaan Keterampilan Kerja Warga Binaan Pemasyarakatan di Lapas Kelas III Dharmasraya. LEX OMNIBUS: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara Dan Administrasi Negara Volume, 1(1), 1–7.
Taufieq, N. A. S., & Sanusi, W. (2018). Masyarakat Petani Pekebun Dengan Pengolahan Hasil Berdasarkan permasalahan di wilayah KKN-PPM yang dimaksud di atas , maka penyelesaian permasalahan disajikan dalam tabel 1 berikut : Jurnal Abdimas Unmer Malang, 3.
Taufiq, R. (2018). “Meningkatkan Sistem Pembinaan Warga Binaan Pemasyarakatan Di Lembaga Pemasyarakatan (Lapas) Sebagai Upaya Untuk Memaksimalkan Penegakan Hukum“. YUDISIA : Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum dan Hukum Islam, 9(1), 198. https://doi.org/10.21043/yudisia.v9i1.3680
Indaka Prasetyo(1*)

