LEGAL POLICY ANALYSIS ON THE GRANTING OF REMISSIONS FOR PRISONERS IN CLASS IIB PRABUMULIH PRISON
Abstract
This study analyzes the implementation of remission policies at the Class IIB Detention Center in Prabumulih and evaluates their alignment with Indonesia’s correctional goals of rehabilitation and social reintegration. It also examines the challenges encountered in the remission process, including overcrowding, inconsistent monitoring of rehabilitation programs, and concerns about fairness, particularly for serious offenders. Using a qualitative empirical approach, the research combines legal analysis with in-depth interviews involving prison officials, inmates, and legal experts, as well as documentation of remission data. The findings show that, in general, inmates who receive remission have fulfilled the required legal criteria. Remission is granted in two forms: general remission, typically provided during national and religious holidays, and special remission, which is given to inmates demonstrating significant rehabilitative progress. However, the effectiveness of the policy is constrained by several factors, including overcrowded conditions and inconsistent supervision of inmate development programs. In addition, public perceptions of fairness, especially regarding remission for serious offenders, pose challenges to the credibility of the system. These issues highlight the need for greater transparency and consistency in policy implementation. In conclusion, while remission policies contribute to the correctional objectives of rehabilitation and reintegration, improvements are necessary. Strengthening access to rehabilitation programs, enhancing monitoring mechanisms, and increasing public awareness about the purpose of remission are recommended to ensure a more effective, fair, and accountable system.
Keywords: Remission; Correctional System; Rehabilitation
Downloads
References
https://repository.uisu.ac.id/handle/123456789/4202
Aldianto, M. Y., & Phahlevy, R. R. (2024). Hak remisi bagi narapidana pasca amandemen konstitusi. Journal Customary Law, 1(3), 20–20.
Davai, N., Fuad, F., & Machmud, A. (2025). Posisi terpidana korupsi dalam regulasi: Dampak dan persepsi keadilan masyarakat. Binamulia Hukum, 14(1), 203–216.
Fahlevi, R., Marzuki, M., & Muttaqien, A. (2024). Analisis pemenuhan hak narapidana kelompok rentan pada Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Kelas IIB Sigli berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 22 Tahun 2022 tentang Pemasyarakatan. Meusapat: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 4(2).
Firdaus, A. A., Marsuni, L., & Djanggih, H. (2025). Tinjauan yuridis pemberian remisi terhadap narapidana kasus korupsi di Hari Kemerdekaan Indonesia. Legal Dialogica, 1(1), 11–21.
Hutasohit, A., Joma, P., & Siregar, G. T. (2022). Analisis hukum terhadap eks narapidana narkotika yang melakukan tindak pidana pengedaran narkotika. JURNAL RECTUM: Tinjauan Yuridis Penanganan Tindak Pidana, 4(1), 406–417.
Keputusan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 174 Tahun 1999 tentang Remisi.
Maesty, A. D. P., & Soeskandi, H. (2022). Pemberian remisi bagi pelaku tindak pidana korupsi. Bureaucracy Journal: Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance, 2(3), 1214–1240.
Peraturan Menteri Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Nomor 16 Tahun 2023 tentang Syarat dan Tata Cara Pemberian Remisi, Asimilasi, Cuti Mengunjungi Keluarga, Pembebasan Bersyarat, Cuti Menjelang Bebas, dan Cuti Bersyarat.
Pratama, R., & Faniyah, I. (2025). Pemberian remisi terhadap narapidana korupsi dalam perspektif hak asasi manusia. Ekasakti Legal Science Journal, 2(2), 100–108.
Rahmat, D., Sgn, S. Z., Pasaribu, C. C., & Wendra, A. (2025). Penerapan hukuman disiplin bagi warga binaan studi kasus di Rumah Tahanan Negara Kelas I Cipinang. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dirgantara, 16(1).
https://journal.universitassuryadarma.ac.id/index.php/jihd/article/view/1678
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.
Undang-Undang Nomor 22 Tahun 2022 tentang Pemasyarakatan.
Zainab, N. (2022). Kebijakan hukum asimilasi dalam rangka pencegahan dan penanggulangan penyebaran Covid-19. Scripta: Jurnal Kebijakan Publik dan Hukum, 2(1), 164–185.
Misbah Ayu Nafarizka(1*)

