JUDICIAL REASONING IN THE USE OF ON-SITE INSPECTION (DESCENTE) TO DETERMINE CHILD CUSTODY

(A CASE STUDY OF DECISION NO. 677/PDT.G/2024/PA.TGM)

  • Affi Nurul Laily(1*)
    Program Studi Magister Hukum, Universitas Bandar Lampung
  • Bambang Hartono(2)
    Program Studi Magister Hukum, Universitas Bandar Lampung
  • (*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

This study examines the use of local inspection (descente) by judges in child custody disputes at the Religious Court, particularly in Decision Number 677/Pdt.G/2024/PA.Tgm. The research focuses on the legal reasoning behind conducting a direct inspection of a child’s living environment and how the results contribute to judicial evidence in ensuring the best interests of the child. Normatively, the authority of the Religious Court in custody cases is regulated under Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage and the Compilation of Islamic Law, as well as Law Number 7 of 1989 concerning Religious Courts and its amendments. Local inspection (descente) itself is governed by procedural rules such as Article 180 RBg/153 HIR and Supreme Court Circular (SEMA) No. 7 of 2001, primarily aimed at uncovering material truth. Using an empirical legal method with a qualitative approach, data were collected through document analysis and in-depth interviews with judges and related parties. The findings reveal that although descente is traditionally applied to physical objects, its extension to observing a child’s condition and environment is a progressive judicial practice. Through this process, judges are able to obtain objective and direct insights into the child’s living situation—information that cannot be fully captured through documents or witness testimony alone. From a legal standpoint, the results of the local inspection hold free evidentiary value (vrij bewijskracht), which may develop into judicial presumption and strengthen the judge’s conviction in making decisions. In conclusion, local inspection (descente) plays a vital role in safeguarding children’s rights by ensuring decisions are based on comprehensive and factual considerations. However, more specific technical regulations are needed to standardize its implementation and enhance legal certainty in future custody cases.

Keywords: Child Custody; Local Inspection (Descente); Best Interest of the Child

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdul, M. 2016. Penerapan Hukum Acara Perdata di Lingkungan Peradilan Agama edisi kedua. Kencana, Jakarta.

Achmad, A. 2010, Menguak Teori Hukum dan Teori Peradilan Vol. 1, Kencana, Jakarta.

Achmad, M. 2017. Hadhanah dalam Islam (Hak Pengasuhan Anak dalam Sektor Pendidikan Rumah). Journal LPPM Unindra, vol. 02. No. 02.

Afif, M., Buku Ajar (Pengantar Ilmu Hukum), 2024, Yoga Pratama, Semarang.

Amran, S., 2023, Filsafat Hermeneutika (Pemikiran tentang Penemuan Hukum oleh Hakim), Kencana, Jakarta.

Bagir, M., 2012, Kekuasaan Kehakiman Republik Indonesia dalam Era Reformasi, Mandar Maju, Bandung

Bambang, W. 2002. Penelitian Hukum dalam Praktik. Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.

Djaenab. 2018. Efektivitas dan Berfungsinya Hukum Dalam Masyarakat. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Islam, Vol. 4. No. 2.

Edy, I., 2012, Beberapa Catatan Tentang Konvensi Hak Anak, Artikel: Fakulas Hukum Universitas Sumatera Utara

Hadi, S. 2010. Kriminalisasi Anak. PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama. Jakarta.

Harrys, P. T. 2018. Teori dan Praktek Perlindungan Anak dalam Hukum Pidana. Penerbit Andi. Yogyakarta.

Jimly, A. 2005, Kekuasaan Kehakiman di Indonesia, PT Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.

Jujur, S. S. 1986. Ilmu dalam Perspektif Moral, Sosial, dan Politik: Sebuah Dialog tentang Keilmuan Dewasa Ini. Gramedia, Jakarta

Lexy, M. 2011. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Remaja Rosdakarya, Bandung.

Nasir, Dj. 2013. Anak Bukan Untuk Dihukum: Catatan Pembahasan Undang-Undang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak. Sinar Grafika. Jakarta.

Peter, M. M. 2005. Penelitian Hukum, Prenada Media Group, Jakarta.

Salim dan Erlis, S. N., 2013, Penerapan Teori Hukum Pada Tesis dan Disertasi, Rajawali Press, Jakarta.

Sayyid, S. 2008. Fikih Sunnah: Jilid 4, terjemah dari judul yang sama oleh Abdurrahim dan Masrukhin, Cakrawala Publishing, Jakarta.

Soerjono, S., 2018, Efektivitas Hukum dan Penerapan Sanksi, Ramadja Karya, Bandung.

Sry, Y., dkk. “Putusan Hakim Terhadap Hak Asuh Anak Akibat Perceraian Di Pengadilan Agama Polewali Mandar,” Journal Of Lex Philosopy 1, No. 2.

Sunarto. 2019. Peran Aktif Hakim Dalam Perkara Perdata (edisi ketiga). Prenadamedia Group, Jakarta.

Syaflin, H. Dkk., “Tinjauan Hukum Islam Terhadap Pelaksanaan Hak Asuh Anak Dalam Etnis Tapanuli Di
Kecamatan Panti Kabupaten Pasaman,” Jurnal Kajian Dan Pengembangan Umat 5, No. 2

Syamsuddin, P. 2013. Metodologi Penelitian dan Penulisan Karya Ilmiah Hukum Suatu Pengetahuan Praktis. Arus Timur, Makassar

Teguh, S. L. 2021. Hukum Pembuktian Dalam Peradilan di Indonesia. Pustaka Prima, Medan.

Yudho dan Tjandrasari, 2017, Efektivitas Hukum dalam Masyarakat, Majalah Hukum dan Pembangunan, UI Press, Jakarta.

Yahya, H., 2017, Hukum Acara Perdata: Tentang Gugatan, Persidangan, Penyitaan, Pembuktian, dan Putusan Pengadilan, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.

Zaenudin, A., Metode Penelitian Hukum. 2010. Sinar Grafika, Jakarta

PlumX Metrics

Published
2026-05-16
How to Cite
Laily, A., & Hartono, B. (2026). JUDICIAL REASONING IN THE USE OF ON-SITE INSPECTION (DESCENTE) TO DETERMINE CHILD CUSTODY. Journal of Management : Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs), 19(1 - May), 577-584. Retrieved from https://ejurnal.undana.ac.id/index.php/JEM/article/view/27385

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.