Supply chain resilience under uncertainty: Sensitivity and disruption analysis of a MILP-optimized procurement portfolio in an export processing zone manufacturer

  • Sarah Laurence Vololoniaina(1*)
    Department of Management, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Indonesia
  • Jonathan Nahum Marpaung(2)
    Department of Management, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Indonesia
  • (*) Corresponding Author
Keywords: Supply Chain Resilience, Sensitivity Analysis, Supplier Disruption, Procurement Optimization, Mixed-Integer Linear Programming

Abstract

Optimization studies often report cost savings under deterministic conditions, leaving their robustness to real-world uncertainty insufficiently explored. This study evaluates the robustness of a previously developed Mixed-Integer Linear Programming (MILP) procurement model for Company XYZ, a protective apparel manufacturer operating in Madagascar’s Export Processing Zone. The model is stress-tested under three scenarios: adverse supplier cost shifts, demand fluctuations of ±15%, and the loss of the lowest-cost supplier in each material category. Across five material categories, the optimal supplier allocation remains robust to moderate cost and demand shocks. However, supplier disruptions reveal substantial differences in resilience across materials. Thread and fabric retain most of their cost savings, whereas zippers, buckles, and Velcro lose most or all of their cost advantage when their lowest-cost supplier becomes unavailable. These findings demonstrate that supplier-diversification constraints can limit exposure to supplier-related risks but are insufficient to ensure procurement resilience. The study also identifies material categories where backup-supplier qualification should be prioritized to strengthen supply chain resilience while preserving procurement cost advantages.

Keywords: Supply Chain Resilience; Sensitivity Analysis; Supplier Disruption; Procurement Optimization; Mixed-Integer Linear Programming

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Birkie, S. E., & Trucco, P. (2020). Effective supply chain management. 36(7), 27–29. https://doi.org/10.1108/SD-04-2020-0081

Clautiaux, F., & Ljubić, I. (2025). Last fifty years of integer linear programming : A focus on recent practical advances. European Journal of Operational Research, 324(3), 707–731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2024.11.018

Emrouznejad, A., & Abbasi, S. (2023). Supply Chain Analytics Supply chain risk management : A content analysis-based review of existing and emerging topics. 3(July). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sca.2023.100031

Higle, J. L., Wallace, S. W., Higle, J. L., & Wallace, S. W. (2003). Sensitivity Analysis and Uncertainty in Linear Programming. 33(4), 53–60.

Mulvey, J. M., Vanderbei, R. J., Zenios, S. A., Apr, M., Apr, N. M., Mulvey, J. M., & Vanderbei, R. J. (1995). Robust Optimization of Large-Scale Systems, INFORMS Stable 43(2), 264–281.

Sangaiah, A. K., Tirkolaee, E. B., Goli, A., & Dehnavi-Arani, S. (2020). Robust optimization and mixed-integer linear programming model for LNG supply chain planning problem. Soft Computing, 24(11), 7885–7905. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-019-04010-6

Shaghayegh, R.-A., & Godfrey, A. B. (2024). Disruptions and Adaptations: COVID-19’s Impact on Textile Supply Chain Management. Advances in Science and Technology, 146. https://doi.org/10.4028/p-LBud8y

Shen, L., Zheng, K., & Ye, Y. (2025). International Journal of Production Economics Supplier concentration and operational efficiency during catastrophic risks. 290(July).

Snyder, L. V, Atan, Z., Peng, P., Rong, Y., Schmitt, A. J., Sinsoysal, B., Snyder, L. V, Atan, Z., Peng, P., Rong, Y., Schmitt, A. J., Snyder, L. V, Atan, Z., Peng, P., Rong, Y., Schmitt, A. J., & Sinsoysal, B. (2016). OR / MS models for supply chain disruptions : A review OR / MS models for supply chain disruptions
https://doi.org/10.1080/0740817X.2015.1067735

Tomlin, B., Science, S. M., May, N., & Tomlin, B. (2006). On the Value of Mitigation and Contingency Strategies for Managing Supply Chain Disruption Risks. 52(5), 639–657.

Tseng, M., Bui, T., Lim, M. K., Fujii, M., & Mishra, U. (2022). Assessing data-driven sustainable supply chain management indicators for the textile industry under industrial disruption and ambidexterity. International Journal of Production Economics, 245(December 2021), 108401.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108401

Wisner, Tan, & Leong. (2023). Principles of Supply Chain Management.

Wu, D., & Lisser, A. (2023). Neurocomputing A deep learning approach for solving linear programming problems. Neurocomputing, 520, 15–24.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2022.11.053

PlumX Metrics

Published
2026-11-06
How to Cite
Vololoniaina, S., & Marpaung, J. (2026). Supply chain resilience under uncertainty: Sensitivity and disruption analysis of a MILP-optimized procurement portfolio in an export processing zone manufacturer. Journal of Management : Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs), 19(3), 2377-2385. https://doi.org/10.35508/jom.v19i3.29418

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.