PERBANDINGAN UNJUK KERJA COAP DAN HTTP PADA TRANSAKSI DATA PERANGKAT IOT

  • Hendro FJ Lami(1*)
    Undana
  • Stephanie I. Pella(2)
    Universitas Nusa Cendana
  • (*) Corresponding Author
Keywords: COAP, HTTP, IoT

Abstract

Internet of Things (IoT) is the interconnection of several devices that have specific tasks such as sensing and control. The services in the system can be in the form of one device - one service, many devices - one service, one device -many services, and many devices - many services. A communication protocol is agreed upon by the devices in the IoT system to ensure the success of data transactions. These protocols include MQTT, HTTP, AMQP, XMPP, Web Shocket, and COAP. This study compares the performance of the COAP and HTTP protocols in consideration of the number of transactions and energy consumption. The scenario used is to send RSSI data and battery level. The scenarios also use two modes of transmission power:14dBm and 20dBm. The results show that the COAP protocol is 25 times more efficient than the HTTP protocol for a 20dBm transmit power scenario, while for a transmit power of 14dBm COAP is 61 times 

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Stephanie I. Pella, Universitas Nusa Cendana

Program Studi Teknik Elektro Fakultas Sains dan Teknik

References

A. Verma, S. Prakash, V. Srivastava, A. Kumar, and S. C. Mukhopadhyay, "Sensing, controlling, and IoT infrastructure in smart building: A review," IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 19, no. 20, pp. 9036-9046, 2019.

https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2019.2922409

S. K. Datta and C. Bonnet, "Connect and control things: integrating lightweight IoT framework into a mobile application," in 2015 9th international conference on next generation mobile applications, services and technologies, 2015, pp. 66-71: IEEE.

https://doi.org/10.1109/NGMAST.2015.23

PMid:25889947

F. Samie, L. Bauer, and J. Henkel, "IoT technologies for embedded computing: A survey," in 2016 International Conference on Hardware/Software Codesign and System Synthesis (CODES+ ISSS), 2016, pp. 1-10: IEEE.

https://doi.org/10.1145/2968456.2974004

A. Kelati, I. B. Dhaou, and H. Tenhunen, "Biosignal monitoring platform using Wearable IoT," in Proceedings of the 22st Conference of Open Innovations Association FRUCT, Petrozavodsk, Russia, 2018, pp. 9-13.

A. A. Abdellatif, M. G. Khafagy, A. Mohamed, and C.-F. J. I. I. o. T. J. Chiasserini, "EEG-based transceiver design with data decomposition for healthcare IoT applications," vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 3569-3579, 2018.

https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2018.2832463

A. Karmakar, K. Ganguly, and P. S. Banerjee, "SafeBand: IoT-Based Smart Security Band with Instant SOS Messaging," in Proceedings of International Conference on Advanced Computing Applications, 2022, pp. 127-140: Springer.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5207-3_12

M. S. Mahamud, M. S. R. Zishan, S. I. Ahmad, A. R. Rahman, M. Hasan, and M. L. Rahman, "Domicile-an IoT based smart home automation system," in 2019 International Conference on Robotics, Electrical and Signal Processing Techniques (ICREST), 2019, pp. 493-497: IEEE.

https://doi.org/10.1109/ICREST.2019.8644349

A. K. Gupta and R. Johari, "IOT based electrical device surveillance and control system," in 2019 4th international conference on internet of things: Smart innovation and usages (IoT-SIU), 2019, pp. 1-5: IEEE.

https://doi.org/10.1109/IoT-SIU.2019.8777342

M. M. A. Zahra, M. J. Mohsin, L. A. J. P. o. E. Abdul-Rahaim, and N. Sciences, "Artificial intelligent smart home automation with secured camera management-based GSM, cloud computing, and arduino," vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 2160-2168, 2020.

J. Ding, M. Nemati, C. Ranaweera, and J. J. a. p. a. Choi, "IoT connectivity technologies and applications: A survey," 2020.

https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2985932

S. Li, L. Da Xu, and S. J. J. o. I. I. I. Zhao, "5G Internet of Things: A survey," vol. 10, pp. 1-9, 2018.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2018.01.005

S. Popli, R. K. Jha, and S. J. I. A. Jain, "A survey on energy efficient narrowband internet of things (NBIoT): architecture, application and challenges," vol. 7, pp. 16739-16776, 2018.

https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2881533

J. Haxhibeqiri, E. De Poorter, I. Moerman, and J. J. S. Hoebeke, "A survey of LoRaWAN for IoT: From technology to application," vol. 18, no. 11, p. 3995, 2018.

https://doi.org/10.3390/s18113995

PMid:30453524 PMCid:PMC6264067

S. K. Lee, M. Bae, and H. Kim, "Future of IoT Networks: A Survey," vol. 7, no. 10, p. 1072, 2017.

https://doi.org/10.3390/app7101072

B. D. Costa and G. Shet, "Low Power IoT System Node Design," in 2019 10th International Conference on Computing, Communication and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT), 2019, pp. 1-8: IEEE.

https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCCNT45670.2019.8944599

M. F. Almeida, S. M. Xará, J. Delgado, and C. A. J. W. M. Costa, "Characterization of spent AA household alkaline batteries," vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 466-476, 2006.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2005.04.005

PMid:15964181

PlumX Metrics

Published
2022-10-29
How to Cite
[1]
H. Lami and S. Pella, “PERBANDINGAN UNJUK KERJA COAP DAN HTTP PADA TRANSAKSI DATA PERANGKAT IOT”, JME, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 172 - 177, Oct. 2022.
Section
Articles