Analisis Dampak Variasi Data Transmisi pada Kinerja Protokol MAC Sistem Komunikasi Wireless Body Area Network

  • Hendro FJ Lami Undana
  • Stephanie Imelda Pella
Keywords: WBAN, T-MAC, Zigbee, Troughput

Abstract

Protokol media access control (MAC) berperan menjamin keberhasilan transmisi data antar sensor nirkabel dan konsumsi daya pada Wireless Body Area Network (WBAN). Penelitian ini membandingkan unjuk kerja dua buah protocol MAC, yaitu T-MAC dan ZigbeeMAC pada sistem WBAN, pada laju kedatangan paket (λ) yang berbeda. Hasil simulasi menunjukan bahwa pada jaringan dengan λ rendah tingkat keberhasilan pengiriman paket antara protocol T-MAC dan ZigbeeMAC mencapai rata-rata 90% dari throughput maksimal walaupun pada kondisi tersebut kinerja ZigbeeMAC memiliki nilai lebih baik dibanding T-MAC. Pada laju kedatangan paket tinggi, throughput pada T-MAC memiliki perbedaan yang signifikan terhadap ZigbeeMAC. Pada keadaan terburuk troughput T-MAC adalah 88% dari throughput maksimal sedangkan Zigbee menurun hingga 43% dari throughput maksimal. Kosumsi daya pada ZigbeeMAC cenderung konstan untuk setiap laju kedatangan paket sedangkan pada T-MAC meningkat sejalan dengan pertambahan laju kedatangan paket.  

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Chen, M., Gonzalez, S., Vasilakos, A., Cao, H. and Leung, V.C., 2011. Body area networks: A survey. Mobile networks and applications, 16(2), pp.171-193.
[2] Movassaghi, S., Abolhasan, M., Lipman, J., Smith, D. and Jamalipour, A., 2014. Wireless body area networks: A survey. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 16(3), pp.1658-1686.
[3] Ullah, S., Shen, B., Riazul Islam, S.M., Khan, P., Saleem, S. and Sup Kwak, K., 2009. A study of MAC protocols for WBANs. Sensors, 10(1), pp.128-145.
[4] Timmons, N.F. and Scanlon, W.G., 2004, October. Analysis of the performance of IEEE 802.15. 4 for medical sensor body area networking. In Sensor and ad hoc communications and networks, 2004. IEEE SECON 2004. 2004 First Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on (pp. 16-24). IEEE.
[5] Hayajneh, T., Almashaqbeh, G., Ullah, S. and Vasilakos, A.V., 2014. A survey of wireless technologies coexistence in WBAN: analysis and open research issues. Wireless Networks, 20(8), pp.2165-2199.
[6] Chiplunkar, N., Nayak, K. and Prasad, D. (2016). Performance Analysis of the Physical and Medium Access Control Layer Parameters with Effect of Varying Transmission Power Using IEEE 802.15.4 Standard for Wireless Body Sensor Networks. Procedia Computer Science, 93, pp.639-646.
[7] Nepal, S., Dahal, S. and Shin, S., 2016. Does the IEEE 802.15. 4 MAC Protocol Work Well in Wireless Body Area Networks. J. Adv. Comput. Netw, 4(1), pp.52-57.
[8] Van Dam, T. and Langendoen, K., 2003, November. An adaptive energy-efficient MAC protocol for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems (pp. 171-180). ACM.
[9] AlSkaif, T., Bellalta, B., Zapata, M.G. and Ordinas, J.M.B., 2017. Energy efficiency of MAC protocols in low data rate wireless multimedia sensor networks: A comparative study. Ad Hoc Networks, 56, pp.141-157.
[10] Cpham.perso.univ-pau.fr. (2018). [online] Available at: http://cpham.perso.univ-pau.fr/ENSEIGNEMENT/PAU-UPPA/INGRES-M1/Castalia%20-%20User%20Manual.pdf [Accessed 7 Dec. 2018].
Published
2018-12-19
How to Cite
Lami, H., & Pella, S. (2018). Analisis Dampak Variasi Data Transmisi pada Kinerja Protokol MAC Sistem Komunikasi Wireless Body Area Network. Media Elektro, 55 - 58. Retrieved from https://ejurnal.undana.ac.id/jme/article/view/484
Section
Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.