Analisis Kinerja Kolom Pipih dan Kolom Konvensional pada Bangunan Bertingkat Rendah

Performance Analysis of Flat Columns and Conventional Columns in Low- Rise Building

  • Tersianus Rada Sakti(1)
    Universitas Nusa Cendana
  • Remigildus Cornelis(2)
    Universitas Nusa Cendana
  • Dolly W. Karels(3*)
    Universitas Nusa Cendana
  • (*) Corresponding Author
Keywords: Kolom Pipih, Kolom Konvensional, Bangunan Tingkat Rendah

Abstract

Unconventional columns are very familiar in modern building construction because they impact the room's efficiency. Meanwhile, conventional columns affect the lack of efficiency in the room's functions. The performance analysis of the two types of columns used pushover analysis of the capacity spectrum method using ETABS v 16.1.0 software. The performance level results of the two types of columns in low-rise buildings are the same, which is Immediate Occupancy. The most significant maximum shearing force is at a low-rise building with an unconventional column with a maximum displacement on the east side of 160,00 mm. The smallest is a low-rise building with a conventional column in the east direction with maximum displacement on the Nort side of 90,11 mm. Thus, comparing the performance of the two types of columns can be concluded that conventional columns are stronger than unconventional columns.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Asroni, Ali. 2010. Kolom Fondasi & Balok T Beton Bertulang. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
ATC-40. 1996. Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Building. California: Applied Technology Council.
Badan Standarisasi Nasional. 2012. Standar Perencanaan Ketahanan Gempa Untuk Struktur Bangunan Gedung (SNI 1726-2012). Jakarta: BSN.

BPS. “Kota Kupang Dalam Angka 2012 Dan 2019.” www.bps.go.id (February 24, 2020).
Frans, R, F Thioriks, J Tanijaya, and H T Kalangi. 2013. “Analisis Diagram Interaksi Kolom Pada Perencanaan Kolom Pipih Beton Bertulang.” 7(KoNTekS 7): 54–60.
Gurki, J. Thambah Sembiring. 2010. Beton Bertulang Edisi Revisi. Bandung: Rekayasa Sains.
P, Anindityo Budi. 2011. Evaluasi Kinerja Seismik Struktur Beton Dengan Analisis Pushover Prosedur A Menggunakan Program ETABS v 9.50. Surakarta: Program Studi Teknik Sipil Universitas Sebelas Maret.
PPIUG. 1983. Peraturan-Pembebanan-Indonesia-1983. Bandung: Yayasan Lembaga Penyelidikan Masalah bangunan.
Suryoatmono, Bambang. 1991. Struktur. Bandung: Eresco.
Umum, Departemen Pekerjaan. 2002. Tata Cara Perhitungan Struktur Beton Untuk Bangunan Gedung (SNI 03-2847-2002) Dilengkapi Penjelasan (S-2002). Bandung: Yayasan Badan Penerbit PU.

PlumX Metrics

Published
2022-05-28